atheisme.eu

He ik wist niet of dit in het maatschappij stukje moest of bij de ehtiek maar het beslaat beide dus het zal hier wel goed staan.

Dit artikel gaat over de richting waar we met de hedentendaagse ontwikkelingen in de wetenschap heengaan.Het beschrijft op een heel duidelijke manier wat de gevolgen kunnen zijn van de onbegrensde mogelijkheden van tegenwoordig.


Het hele artikel kun je vinden op: http://www.outlawjournalism.com/



Laat je niet misleiden door de inleiding,Het heeft in het begin veel weg van conspiracy-theorie,maar het gaat zeer diep in op de gevaren van oa genetische manipulatie,de invloed van electronische implantaten op de vrijheid van het individu en de globalisatie.

This “Truth Movement” has been happening for quite awhile now. Those of us who have been involved in it for a significant amount of time have seen the public awareness of factual information which has been commonly referred to as “conspiracy theory” rise exponentially. Most people you meet are aware of the questions surrounding the attacks of 9/11. Large numbers of people understand the devious nature of the banking system. Significant segments of the world population are finally becoming informed about, and in turn adopting a righteous hostility toward, the one world government system that is being rolled out by the mainstream media as the only solution to the engineered global economic collapse and the totally fabricated “climate crisis”.

The world is headed nowhere good, and a lot of people get that. But still it moves forward, and we stand helpless, stunned like deer in the headlights, incapable of reacting in any meaningful way to the certain death we appear to be facing. I believe our inability to effectively respond to this crisis is rooted in our inability to see it for what it really is. We know the details. We see what is wrong, but we don’t know how to stop it because we haven’t yet looked at what caused it, and we have yet to question the deeper meaning behind it.

In a series of articles, of which you are now reading the first, I am going to attempt to explain in the simplest terms possible what is really happening, and why it is happening, and finally the only sensible way that we can possibly respond to it. This is less a “series of articles” than it is the new theme of this webpage. I have spent more than two years now trying to come up with a way to describe the revelations that I have come to regarding the state of the Planet Earth, and I have decided that I must simply tell it how it is, as best I can, and let you all do with it what you will.

We need a new paradigm. Mine is a rather straightforward one, when compared to those offered by the moguls of this so-called movement. I have immersed myself in the available information regarding the world system for a long time. I have been all the way around the problem, looked at it all from every angle, and I honestly believe there is only one conclusion that a person looking at this thing with pure honesty can draw. My hope is that the brighter ones among you will take what I am presenting and run with it.

What I have determined is that civilization as a whole was a scam from the beginning, and the only logical path for humanity to take is to utterly abandon it and return to a hunter/gatherer lifestyle. Ultimately, this is going to happen whether you want it to or not, as there is no other way it can go, but if you understand that it will happen, and why it must happen, you are going to be psychologically, and perhaps even physically, prepared for the total collapse of the entirety of world civilization. At the very least, you are going to be able to quit wasting your time running around talking about Ron Paul and building 7.

So let us begin. In the following paragraphs I will lay out the basic concepts which I will proceed to elaborate on in future essays.

The Future as They See It

A person who is moderately educated in world happenings can see pretty clearly what the future holds, if he wants to. Most people don’t want to. Let’s run through a quick review of the not-so-distant future, as envisioned by the ruling elite.

The once sovereign nations of the planet are very rapidly being brought under the umbrella of a system of “global governance”. This is very public nowadays, with Obama figure-heading the recent G-20 summit where it was declared that we need a “New World Order” where a “world authority” will regulate the “globalized economy”. For those who don’t know, the economic system of any country is the basis for its government; so this was a hardly veiled declaration by all of the world’s power entities that they are now taking steps to solidify a system of global government. The plan is to set up the United Nations as a global authority under which the individual nations are simply “states”, the laws and practices of which are dictated to by the top. But you already knew that.

It does not take an MIT statistician to determine that this system of global government will follow the same trend that all of the governments which are coming together to form it have been following. Personal freedom will continue to deteriorate while those in power continue to make more and more of our decisions for us. The gap between the rich and the poor will continue to widen. The education system will continue to step up the intensity of the bizarre indoctrination our children are undergoing. We will keep fighting Muslims in the name of an elusive concept called “democracy”. We will keep drinking fluoridated water and eating genetically modified food. Political correctness will be enforced more and more aggressively. We will still be inundated with ubiquitous microwave radiation from cell phone towers and wi-fi antennas. And the masses will still be watching TV and letting the experts do the thinking.

The United Nations has stated on more than one occasion that China is the model state for the world. So expect it to just keep getting slowly worse, until you find yourself being pulled out of your apartment and tortured in a van because you looked at something you weren’t supposed to on the Internet. Or you get put into a prison where you will wait for your organs to be harvested and sold to some rich technocrat because it was found that you were taking part in religious practices not condoned by the state. Or your wife gets dragged off to have a forced abortion preformed on her because you didn’t pull out in time.

Meanwhile, as the governments of the world move swiftly to set up an Orwellian nightmare society in the name of security and saving mother Gaia, parallel developments taking place in the world of science and technology are mind-bendingly insane. This side of the equation is not being broadcast as loudly, but the information is all there, for those with the desire to look it up. Science magazines and websites are reporting daily on developments in nanotechnology, biotechnology, artificial intelligence, genetic engineering and brain-computer interface technology.

This certainly might sound a bit far-fetched to those living in the mundane world of television fantasy, but it is all there for anyone interested to see. Ray Kurzweil, the 62-year-old head of Singularity University, a joint venture between Google and NASA, believes that technology is progressing at such a rate that he will be able to extend his life indefinitely. Active denial systems are capable of subduing entire cities with the use of a single soldier. Paraplegics with wires plugged into their brains are operating machines and surfing the Internet with their thoughts. Scientists have been mixing and matching genes of animals and plants to create new species for over half a decade now; it was recently announced that the glowing green monkeys are able to have baby glowing green monkeys. This is all happening now. We are living in a science fiction nightmare.

So when you combine the emerging totalitarian world state with these emerging technologies which have an incalculable risk of abuse, what we end up with is a hell on earth. Humanity as we have known it is going to cease to exist as we move into the post-human era. Every trait by which we have defined our humanness will be lost in the whirlwind of progress. The existing populations we be utterly subdued through electronic means as the ruling elite, at last capable of attaining eternal life, begin production of new types of genetically engineered slaves to serve in their everlasting kingdom.

This is the plan as it stands.

Can We Save Our Society?

The popular rhetoric spewed by all of the so-called leaders of the Truth Movement focuses on targeting the people in power, claiming that if we are able to somehow remove them from power, we have solved our problem. What I am arguing is that the people in power are interchangeable, and simply mechanisms by which a very old process is reaching the stage of fruition. We are rapidly approaching the end of a very long cycle.

These official talkers, on the Patriot stations and websites, typically talk about Jews and Masons and whatever else, and how they have hijacked our system, and if we can simply take it back though some unexplainable means, and transfer power over to Ron Paul or whoever else, we can use new technologies for good and establish a paradise on earth. Let me state clearly that I am not claiming these people in power are not responsible for their actions. I am simply saying that if they were not there, others would be. They are playing a role.

Take a brief look at the history of “civilization” and what you see is an virtually unbroken line of slavery and oppression. There are almost no examples of governments that were not oppressive. From Sumer, Egypt, and Rome, to European feudalism, and up through modern day capitalist and communist systems, there is always a small elite ruling over a mass of peasants. As everything about our society changes, this remains a constant. This is the simple fact of the matter. What we are seeing now with the encroachment of this scientific dictatorship is merely the logical conclusion to the process of what is commonly referred to as “progress”.

Civilization is based upon the centralization of a power structure over vast numbers of people. Centralized power necessitates centralized leadership and control. Whenever you have this, you are going to have a situation where very intelligent people who desire to be in control are able to attain these positions. These people are psychopaths. That is the personality type that seeks power over other people. Normal people don’t have this desire, and will generally even feel uncomfortable with the idea of holding such positions. Again, history bares witness. As technology advances, power becomes further centralized, with the ruling forces able to exercise control over finer and finer details of our lives.

Many seem to have the idea that technology, and societal “progress”, will ultimately result in our freedom as a species. The popular propaganda film Zeitgeist: Addendum is a prime example of this ideology. Believing that this system, which has always been rooted in slavery, and used every new advancement in science to further exploit and abuse the huddled masses, will somehow eventually lead to freedom after progressing to a certain point is equivalent to a girl who is repeatedly sexually abused by her step-father believing that eventually, if he just keeps raping her in more and more perverse ways, it will eventually lead to a meaningful and loving relationship. It is pathological.

And what if we did put Ron Paul (or some like minded populist) in charge? Never mind the fact that this is impossible, given the state of the popular media, which ultimately makes people’s choices for them. Let’s say it happened, and by some inexplicable miracle, the real powers behind the throne did not have him assassinated. For starters, in this globalized world of free trade, where slaves in China can make everything for cheaper than people in the first world where people are accustomed to a semi-decent standard of living, his free market capitalism would be utterly useless in stemming the collapsing markets of the United States, as it is no longer viable for corporations to produce anything here. As a matter of fact, given globalization, and the fact that technology has made the world a very small place, independent nations are themselves no longer viable. It just doesn’t make sense. The people talking about Ron Paul saving us are trying to bring back a system of doing things that simply cannot work in this new age of ours.

In the fantasy world where getting a populist leader into power were possible, there is also no way to stop the progress of technology, which is more and more removing human autonomy. You could attempt to outlaw the implantation of computer chips into people’s brains, but the fact of the matter is that people are going to demand that computer chips be put in their brains, so they can take part in the virtual reality video games and pornography. The companies producing these chips are inevitably going to be taking liberties with people’s brains, reviewing their thoughts and marketing specific products to them based on what they find, for instance. Then it would move quickly into the government demanding access to people’s thoughts in order to determine who is likely to be a threat to society, and ultimately collaborating with the companies in using the implant technologies to alter the brain patterns of users in order to keep them in line. This would be logical for any leader who wanted to eliminate social ills.

The same goes for genetic engineering; if you can remove the genes that make someone liable to get cancer, why not start breeding people who don’t get cancer? And from there we logically must ask, if we are able, why not make people stronger, smarter and better looking? And then it quickly moves to, why not make people genetically prone to docility and obedience, if we can prevent violence, rape, and murder?

The life extension technology brings up a similar ethical conundrum. If we are able to extend people’s lives significantly, and perhaps indefinitely, we are going to end up with way too many people on this planet. The government, even a benevolent one, would be forced to implement breeding laws, with forced abortions and sterilization, in order to avert a crisis.

So even for leaders with good intentions, the apparently logical and responsible uses of these technologies would lead to a world of mindless slaves, automatons not really even existing at all, living in a totally controlled environment. And the people in charge do not have such intentions.

Where Do We Go Now?

What I am ultimately saying here is that a civilization run by a government has never worked, and it never will. Institutions of power will always end up corrupt, and technology will always end up being used by those corrupt institutions for their own ends. Luckily, the cycle of oppression and degradation is coming to a close, as this system will soon implode in on itself. Humanity approaches a new dawn. Sadly, everyone has become addicted to the conveniences of modern living; it is very difficult for anyone to even imagine giving them up, and so the end of the scientific era is going to result in the deaths of most of the people on the planet.

The pertinent question here is: how exactly has technological society improved the quality of our lives? Even the most ardent supporters of “progress” have a very difficult time answering this question. People will eventually give improvements in health care as a definite benefit of the scientific age, as this is really the only one which even appears to make sense. However, other than the infant mortality rate (which is something I plan to examine in detail in a future essay), I think it is hard to argue our health has improved at all, even with the abundance of futuristic medical technology. Virtually everything in our environment contains toxic chemicals; our bodies are infested with them. We are inundated with electromagnetic radiation. The food we eat is for the most part poisonous. Our water is filled with drugs, fluoride and poison. People lived better and often longer before any of this technology existed (the statistics for the average lifespans of pre-civilized people factor in infant deaths; these folks often lived to be 100).

When we then examine the positives of tribal living, it becomes clear that as far as quality of life, there really is no comparison at all. For instance, cutting out “work”, which I find to be an utterly horrid concept, would make my life exponentially better. To this people will often respond with claims that tribal people did work, and some will even claim they worked harder than us, which is a nonsensical statement. The “work” that pre-civilized people did was solely related to providing for basic survival needs; no one was making a profit off of them. Picture a tribe who’s main source of food is fish. Their “work” then consists of: fishing. That is it. The women would be responsible for making whatever clothing was needed, which in warmer climates, where people generally lived, was minimal, and sometimes people simply went nude (the profound psychological and spiritual implications of nudity among tribal people will be examined in depth in the near future). Possibly people would stitch together tents, or build huts of some type (if they didn’t live in caves), but this was not something that had to be done very often. I would imagine all of these activities were rather enjoyable, and as such they can be in no way compared to the wage slavery of modern man. Another example to cite is the buffalo hunters of the American planes. The buffalo were an abundant food source, and very easy to kill. These people lived bountiful lives.

Cutting out work, one has time to spend with ones family and tribesmen, having fun, telling stories, making music, creating art, dancing, making love to the wife, joking with the old folks and generally living it up. People lived at peace with God and nature, and where we, in the age of discontent, have holes in our hearts and a yearning for something real, they had peace. Their lives were the diametric opposite of our own.

Thankfully, like the days and the seasons, the ages of man are cyclic, and this too will pass. As I have said, there is nothing else that can happen. The universe has a way of balancing itself out. The choice we face is whether we want to accept this inevitability, and do what we can to secure a future for ourselves and our progeny, or simply die with the masses. The first and biggest step in the process of saving oneself is to recognize and accept the reality of our situation. Most will not, and a lot will become angry at the mere suggestion; but everyone has a choice.

I hope I’ve succeeded here in presenting a basic outline of the direction that I believe the Truth Movement needs to be moving in. I know I am throwing out a lot of different concepts here, all the while trying to keep it as succinct as possible, but bare with me. In the future I am going to be elaborating on all of this, looking in depth at the nature of civilization and the roots of the concept of “progress” and it’s effects on human beings, as well as drawing comparisons between modern living and tribal society and examining how best one can go about living within this scientific dictatorship and maintain some level of personal autonomy, while preparing to deal with its eventual end.

I know that every one of you is confused by everything that is happening, and I know that all of the talkers who have been posted up as our leaders only make you more confused. What I am offering is a different way to look at our own existence, a new paradigm in which everything makes sense. What is happening is happening because we have abandoned our own human nature and gotten lost in an artificial world that is incapable of providing us with the meaning our souls long for. Civilizations have come and gone for millions of years. The ancients have told the tale of global empires which risen and fallen, and this too will pass. As the world burns around us, we stand at the edge of something marvelous.